Volume 19, Issue 2 (May 2021)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2021, 19(2): 137-148 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4383-en.html
1- M.Sc of Medical science. medical educational development center, Isfahan university of medical science, Isfahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Medical science. medical educational development center, Isfahan university of medical science, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author) , faribajowkar@gmail.com
3- Instructor of Medical science. medical educational development center, Isfahan university of medical science, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (2040 Views)
Background & Aims: Continuous evaluation is necessary to evaluate the achievement of goals and determine the quality of educational programs. Accordingly, the present study was conducted with the aim of designing, establishing, and validating the evaluation tools for the specialized doctoral course in medical education based on the CIPP model. Materials & Methods: This descriptive study was performed in 2019 at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. In order to design the questionnaire, internal articles in the field of curriculum evaluation, the latest version of the CIPP model checklist, and general specifications of the medical education doctoral program approved by the Ministry of Health were used. By determining the indicators of each domain, questions were designed in four domains: context, input, process, and output. After designing a questionnaire and selecting 10 samples by stratified random sampling method from three groups of faculty members, students, and graduates and 5 managers of the Department of Medical Education, face and content validity by Lavshi method and content validity index based on Waltz method and Bassel were examined. Finally, the reliability of the questionnaire was estimated by performing on 30 target groups in Shiraz, Tehran, and Iran universities of medical sciences based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: Based on the indicators, 71 questions were obtained for group managers, 88 questions for faculty members, 42 questions for students and 40 questions for graduates. The CVR value was 0.98 for the three groups of faculty members, students, graduates and 0.99 for the group managers. The value of CVI in terms of simplicity, clarity, and relevance for group managers (0.98, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively) faculty members (0.98, 0.98 and 0.97), students (0.97, 0.98, and 0.98) and graduates (0.83, 0.97, and 0.98) were obtained. To evaluate the internal consistency of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. The values ​​of 0.97, 0.95, 0.83, and 0.81 were obtained for the questionnaire of group managers, faculty members, students, and graduates, respectively. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, it can be said that the tools designed to evaluate the specialized doctoral course in medical education had the necessary validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate and identify the strengths and weaknesses of this course in Tehran, Shahid Beheshti, Shiraz, and Iran universities of medical sciences.
Full-Text [PDF 613 kb]   (603 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: آموزش علوم پزشکی

1. Hosseini S, Mohseni Band Pey A, Karami Matin B, Hosseini S, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Jalilian F. Comprehensive evaluation of Shahid Motahari Educational Festival during 2008-2013 based on CIPP Evaluation Model. The Journal of Medical Education and Development 2014; 9(2):56 -68. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
2. Vatankhah S. Salami A. Survey of hospitals evaluation system of Iran university of medical sciences with balance scored card. JHM 2008;12 (38):49 58. (Persian) [URL]
3. Saif AA. Educational measurement, assessment, and evaluation. Tehran: Doran Publisher; 2011. (Persian) [URL]
4. Pazargadi M, Azadiye Ahmad abadi G. Evaluation of higher education in the world and in Iran. Boshra Publisher;2010. (Persian) [URL]
5. Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass;2007. 1-8. [URL]
6. Izadpanah F, Moazzami M, sakhajoo MA, keramat A. Evaluation the Effectiveness of Continuing Training Courses for pharmacists & Physicians Based on the CIPP Model in Food and Drug Administration.2018. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation2019; 113:28-10. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
7. Najimi A, Shafiee F, Haghani F. Evaluation of Self-care Diabet Program in Health System based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Iran J Med Educ2019; 19:472 -82. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
8. Barzegari Esfeden Z, Dashtgard A, Ebadinejad Z. Evaluation of the Realization of Clinical Nursing Students' Learning Objectives Using CIPP Evaluation Model. Iran J Nurs Res 2019; 14(5):66 -72. (Persian) [URL]
9. Sabouri Aghbulagh Rostam Khan T, Imanipour M, Ahmadi S. Reasons and motives for selecting major of medical education as post-graduate course: a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Education and Development 2017; 12(3):133 -46. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
10. Mazloomy Mahmoudabad S S, Moradi L. Evaluation of Externship curriculum for public health Course in Yazd University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences2018; 11(3):28 -36. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
11. Hemati Z, Irajpour A, Allahbakhshian M, Varzeshnejad M, AbdiShahshahani M. Evaluating the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing MSc Program Based on CIPP Model in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ2018; 18:324 -32. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
12. MirzaaAmini S M M, Zakariaee Kermani I, Nili ahmadabadi M R. Urgency and Necessity of the Postgraduate course in the Carpet in higher education based on CIPP model. Journal Scientific Goljaam 2018; 13(32):5 -28. (Persian) [URL]
13. Jannati A, Gholami M, Nariman M, Gholizade M, Kabiri N. Evaluating Educational Program of Bachelor of Sciences in Health Services Management Using CIPP Model in Tabriz. Depiction of Health 2017; 8(2): 104-10. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
14. Yazdani N, Moradi M. Evaluation of the Quality of Undergraduate Nursing Education Program in Ahvaz Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Sadra Medical Sciences Journal2017; 5(5):159 -72. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
15. Ehsanpour S, Yamani N, Kohan SH, Abdi shahanshahi M, Hamidfar B. The Evaluation of Reproductive Health PhD Program in Iran: A CIPP Model Approach. JSDME 2016;12 (1):654-62. (Persian) [ScienceDirect]
16. Shamsa A, Munazza M, Rehman Z. Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development 2018; 5(1): 189-206. [DOI:10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553]
17. Jumari Suwandi. Evaluation of Child-Friendly Schools Program in Islamic Schools Using the CIPP Mode. Dinamika Ilmu 2020;20(2): 323-41. [DOI:10.21093/di.v20i2.2580]
18. Qomaria Agustina N, Mukhtaruddin F. The CIPPModel-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) Program at Language Center. English Language Teaching Educational Journal2019; 2(1): 22-31. [Google Scholar]
19. Tsayang G, Batane T, Majuta A. The impact of interactive Smart boards on students' learning in secondary schools in Botswana: A students perspective. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology 2020;16(2): 22-39. [URL]
20. Eshun p, George Dampson D, Dzakadzie Y. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Internal Quality Assurance System in Public Universities in Ghana. Education Quarterly Reviews 2020; 3(2): 237-48. [DOI:10.31014/aior.1993.03.02.136]
21. Zhang G, Zeller N, Griffith R, Metcalf D, Williams J, Shea C, et al. Using the Context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 2011;15 (4):57 -84. [Google Scholar]
22. Waters LD. Outcome measures of graduates of a master's degree in nursing program: assessing congruence of perceptions of graduates and employers. University of Delaware; 1987. [Google Scholar]
23. Alimohammadi T, Rezaeian M, Bakhshi H, VaziriNejad R. The Evaluation of the Medical School Faculty of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences Based on the CIPP Model in2010. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci2013; 12(3):205 -18. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
24. Habibi A, Adenor M. Structural Equation Modeling and Factor Analysis. Tehran: University Jihad Publisher: 2017. (Persian) [URL]
25. AbdiShahshahani M, Ehsanpour S, Yamani N, Kohan S, Dehghani Z. The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Reproductive Health PhD Program in Iran Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Iran J Med Educ 2014; 14 (3):252-65. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
26. Livingston JD, Rossiter KR, Verdun-Jones SN. Forensic' labelling: An empirical assessment of its effects on self-stigma for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatry Res 2011; 188: 115-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.01.018] [PMID]
27. Patrick W. Self-stigma of mental illness scale short orm: Reliability and validity. Psychiatry Res 2012; 199(1): 65-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.009] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Jorkmant T, Svensson B, Lundberg B. Experiences of stigma among people with severe mental illness. Nord J Psychiatry 2007; 61(1): 322-8. [DOI:10.1080/08039480701642961] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb