Volume 20, Issue 2 (May 2022)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022, 20(2): 155-162 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rajati R, Khadivzade T, Esmaeili H, Danesh F. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF THE COUPLE’S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DESIRES OF FERTILITY OF WORKING WOMEN AND THEIR SPOUSES. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022; 20 (2) :155-162
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4394-en.html
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF THE COUPLE’S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DESIRES OF FERTILITY OF WORKING WOMEN AND THEIR SPOUSES
Reihane Rajati1 , Talat Khadivzade * 2, Habibollah Esmaeili3 , Fereshte Danesh4
1- MSc Student of Counseling in Midwifery, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran and Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University Medical of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran) Corresponding Author , hosseiny.samane@gmail.com
3- Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research center, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
4- MSc in Clinical Psychology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (1173 Views)
Background & Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the quality of couples' relationship with fertility desires of working women and their spouses. Materials & Methods: This descriptive correlational study was performed on 270 married working women and their spouses (total 540 couples) from 2017 to 2018 in Mashhad, Iran. Questionnaires of Couples’ Relationship Quality and Miller Reproductive Motivation were completed. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 24 after ensuring the correctness of data entry. Results: In this study, a total of 540 people (270 couples) were included in this study with a mean age of 34.46±6.61 years for women and 38.15±6.97 years for men. There was a significant difference in the scores related to the quality of the relationship between men and women (P=0.001), which indicated that the average scores of couples' relationship in the group of working women is higher than their husbands. The mean of positive motivations in men and women was also different significantly (P=0.001). Furthermore, the mean of negative motivations in men and women was significantly different (P=0.001). Conclusion: The scores of the questionnaire of Couples’ Relationship Quality are directly related to the desire of fertility in working women. This in turn can affect the desire to have and raise the children. Therefore, paying attention to the quality of couples' relationship and strengthening and improving these relationships is suggested as a suitable way to promote mental health, happiness, and satisfaction of the marriage life.
Keywords: Fertility, Motivations, Working Women, Quality of Couples’ Relationship
Full-Text [PDF 423 kb]   (445 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: مامایی
References
1. Gilligan M, Suitor JJ, Nam S, Routh B, Rurka M, Con G. Family networks and psychological well-being in midlife. Soc Sci 2017;6(3):94. [DOI:10.3390/socsci6030094]
2. Thomas PA, Liu H, Umberson D. Family relationships and well-being. Innov Aaging 2017;1(3):igx025. [DOI:10.1093/geroni/igx025] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Candel O-S, Carciuc RM, Cracan D, Mînzat M, Lungu AL. Is the quality or the frequency of communication? The communication on social networks sites moderates the association between attachment and relational satisfaction. Psihologija 2021;54(1):49-73. [DOI:10.2298/PSI190426020C]
4. Schellekens MP, Karremans JC, van der Drift MA, Molema J, van den Hurk DG, Prins JB, et al. Are mindfulness and self-compassion related to psychological distress and communication in couples facing lung cancer? A dyadic approach. Mindfulness 2017;8(2):325-36 [DOI:10.1007/s12671-016-0602-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Umberson D, Williams K. Marital quality, health, and aging: Gender equity? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2005;60(2):S109-S13. [DOI:10.1093/geronb/60.Special_Issue_2.S109] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Rijken AJ, Liefbroer AC. The influence of partner relationship quality on fertility. Eur J Popul 2009;25(1):27-44. [DOI:10.1007/s10680-008-9156-8]
7. Eshaghi M, Mohebi SF, Papynezhad S, Jahandar Z. Childbearing challenges for working women; a qualitative study. Wom Dev Pol 2014;12(1):111-34. [Google Scholar]
8. Kariman N, Simbar M, Ahmadi F, Vedadhir AA. Ambivalence, outcome of childbearing decision making among women. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2015;24(86):65-76. [Google Scholar]
9. Trinitapoli J, Yeatman S. The flexibility of fertility preferences in a context of uncertainty. Pop Dev Rev 2018;44(1):87. [DOI:10.1111/padr.12114] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Ibisomi L, Odimegwu C. Understanding resolution of differential fertility preferences among couples in Nigeria. Int J Bus Soc 2011;2(4):98-105 [Google Scholar]
11. Hosseini-Chavoshi M, Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P. Fertility, marriage, and family planning in Iran: Implications for future policy. Pop Horiz 2016;13(1):31-40. [DOI:10.1515/pophzn-2016-0005]
12. Torabi F, Sheidani R. Study of Effective Factors in Tendency to Fewer Childbearing of 15-49 Years Old Women Residents of Tehran. J Wom Fam Stud 2019;7(2):31-67. [Google Scholar]
13. Feizollahi N, Nahidi F, Sereshti M, Nasiri M, Motlagh AA. Evaluation of Quality of Life in Women with Abortion Experience in Tehran 2015. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2020;29(1):8-15. [Google Scholar]
14. Rambod E, Mokhtarpour M. Sociological Study of the Impact of Women's Employment on Social Development in Iran (Case of Study: Women Home Business Owners in 16th and 19th Districts of Tehran). J Iranian Soc Dev Stud 2020;12(47):133-58. [Google Scholar]
15. Fellows KJ, Chiu H-Y, Hill EJ, Hawkins AJ. Work-family conflict and couple relationship quality: A meta-analytic study. J Fam Econ Issues 2016;37(4):509-18. [DOI:10.1007/s10834-015-9450-7]
16. Miller WB, Jones J, Pasta DJ. An implicit ambivalence-indifference dimension of childbearing desires in the National Survey of Family Growth. Demographic Res 2016;34:203-42. [DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2016.34.7]
17. Patoo M, Haghighat F, Hassanabadi HR. A Study of the Role of Marital Relationship Quality in Predicting Subjective Well-being and Happiness of University Students. J Wom Fam Stud 2014;2(1):7-24. [Google Scholar]
18. Arghavani E. Fertility preference and its related factors in couples referring to marriage health centers in Mashhad [Dissertation]. Mashhad: Mashhad University od Medical Science; 2012.
19. Harrison CR, Phimphasone-Brady P, DiOrio B, Raghuanath SG, Bright R, Ritchie ND, et al. Barriers and facilitators of National Diabetes Prevention Program engagement among women of childbearing age: a qualitative study. Diabetes Educ 2020;46(3):279-88. [DOI:10.1177/0145721720920252] [PMID]
20. Arghavani E. Fertility preference and its related factors in couples referring to marriage health centers in Mashhad. Mashhad: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; 2014.
21. Miller WB, Bard DE, Pasta DJ, Rodgers JL. Biodemographic modeling of the links between fertility motivation and fertility outcomes in the NLSY79. Demography 2010;47(2):393-414. [DOI:10.1353/dem.0.0107] [PMID] [PMCID]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb