Volume 21, Issue 5 (August 2023)
Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2023, 21(5): 385-393 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Makvandi Z, Alidosti M, Shafaian M, Hemati F. FACTORS AFFECTING CHILDBEARING IN SINGLE-CHILD AND MULTIPLE-CHILDREN MOTHERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2023; 21 (5) :385-393
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4818-en.html
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4818-en.html
1- Assistant Professor of Health Education and Promotion, Department of Public Health, Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran (Corresponding Author) ,malidosti94@gmail.com
3- Research Committee, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran
4- Student Research Committee, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran (Corresponding Author) ,
3- Research Committee, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran
4- Student Research Committee, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran
Abstract: (1356 Views)
Background& Aims: Iran is one of the countries experiencing a sharp decrease in fertility. The present study aimed to determine and compare the factors affecting childbearing in single-child and multiple children mothers.
Material& Methods: In this descriptive study with a cross-sectional-comparative design, 200 married women with medical records in the health center were randomly selected and given into two groups. The first group included mothers with one child over four years of age who did not decide on the subsequent pregnancy, and the second group comprised mothers with two or more children. The data collection tool was a demographic information questionnaire and a fertility pattern questionnaire. Data were analyzed in SPSS ver.20 software using independent t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: From 200 mothers who entered the study, 97 had one child, and the other 103 had two or more children. The mean age was 27.47±5.55 years for the first group and 4.65±4. 32.34 years for the second group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.000). Comparison of the factors affecting fertility in the two groups showed that the most significant difference was in the mean score of government support and welfare facilities, mothers' employment, high costs and economic problems, and spouses' opposition to childbearing (p=0.000).
Conclusion: According to the results, economic issues were among the first factors affecting childbearing. It seems that it is impossible to take steps to increase childbearing and prevent a single-digit growth rate by advertising alone. In this regard, economic and social factors should be considered, and perhaps the economic support of families would be helpful.
Material& Methods: In this descriptive study with a cross-sectional-comparative design, 200 married women with medical records in the health center were randomly selected and given into two groups. The first group included mothers with one child over four years of age who did not decide on the subsequent pregnancy, and the second group comprised mothers with two or more children. The data collection tool was a demographic information questionnaire and a fertility pattern questionnaire. Data were analyzed in SPSS ver.20 software using independent t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: From 200 mothers who entered the study, 97 had one child, and the other 103 had two or more children. The mean age was 27.47±5.55 years for the first group and 4.65±4. 32.34 years for the second group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.000). Comparison of the factors affecting fertility in the two groups showed that the most significant difference was in the mean score of government support and welfare facilities, mothers' employment, high costs and economic problems, and spouses' opposition to childbearing (p=0.000).
Conclusion: According to the results, economic issues were among the first factors affecting childbearing. It seems that it is impossible to take steps to increase childbearing and prevent a single-digit growth rate by advertising alone. In this regard, economic and social factors should be considered, and perhaps the economic support of families would be helpful.
References
1. Aradmehr M. Socio-demographic and religious factors affecting fertility rate among childbearing women in Easter Iran: A population-based study. Reprod Health 2019;7(1):1553-9. [Google Scholar]
2. Ghamami MM, Azizi H. Requirements of the legislative policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran's population. Womens Strat Stud 2015;17(66):117. (Persian) [URL]
3. Ramezankhani A, Manouchehri H, Hajizadeh E, Haghi M. The decision-making process of childbearing: a qualitative study. Payesh 2013;12(5):505-15. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
4. Chaurasia AR. Fertility, mortality and age composition effects of population transition in China and India: 1950-2015. Comp Popul Stud 2017;42:149-86.
https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-12 [DOI:10.12765/cpos-2017-12]
5. Farrokh Eslamlou HR, Vahabzadeh Z, Moeini SR, MoghadamTabrizi F. Pre-marriage couples fertility attitude following recent childbearing persuasive policies In Iran. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2014;11(10):836-46. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
6. Amiri F, Najafi R. Investigating of Factors Affecting the Fertility Pattern of Arak City in 2018 With the Struc- tural Equation Modeling. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2020;23(3):360-73. (Persian). [DOI:10.32598/jams.23.3.5531.3]
7. Amiri F, Rafiei M, Najafi R. Study of Fertility and Use of Pregnancy Contraceptive Methods in Women Referring to Remedial Centers in Arak City in 2017. J Arak Uni Med Sci. 2019;22(3):1-10. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
8. Vatanparast Z, Peyman N, Esmaeili H, Gholian Avval M. Effect of Educa-tional Program Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on the Childbearing Intention in One-Child Women. J Educ Comm Health 2021;8(4):279-81. [DOI:10.52547/jech.8.4.279]
9. Afarini FS, Akbari N, Montazeri A. The relationship between social support and the intention of childbearing in women of reproductive age. Payesh 2018;17(3):315-28. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
10. Foroutan Y, Mirzaei S. Ethnic preferences for childbearing in Iran. Iran Popul Stud J 2018;4(2):35-60. (Persian) [URL]
11. Hosseini H, Bagi B. Socioeconomic, cultural and demographic determinants of childbearing desires among married women attending health centers in Hamedan (2012). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2014;18(1). (Persian) [Google Scholar]
12. Erfani A, Jahanbakhsh R, Kalantari A. Individualism and Fertility Intentions. J Popul Assoc Iran 2020;15:239-64. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
13. Ghaffari F, Motaghi Z. Factors Affecting Childbearing Based on Women's Perspectives: A Qualitative Study. Navid No 2021;23(76):33-43. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
14. Soltan Z, Eini-Zinab H, Eslami M, Motlagh M. Multivariate Analysis of Iran's Period Fertility Changes in the 1370s & 1380s. J Popul Assoc Iran 2019;15:171-205. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
15. Mahzoon A, Mahmoudian H,Torabi F. Relation between Social Mobility and Fertility in Iran Using Censuses and Household Income and Expenditure Surveys Data. J Popul Assoc Iran 2019;14:59-84. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
16. Abbasi Shawazi M, Razeqi Nasrabadi H, Hosseini Chavoshi M. Socio Economic Security and Fertility Intention in Tehran City. J Popul Assoc Iran 2020;15:211-38. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
17. Niazi M, Torenjipoor F, Norozi M, Asgari Kviri A. Meta-Analysis of Social Factors Affecting FertilIty in Iran. Soc Dev Welfare Plann 2017;29: 69-118. (Persian) [URL]
18. Arjmand Siahpoush E, Zeini Wendian M, Rezapour D. A sociological analysis for factors affecting the attitude toward childbearing (case study: Employees of Andimeshk Department of Education. Q J Soc Dev 2021;16(1):59-78. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
19. Shojaee J and Yazdkhasty B. A systematic review of fertility reduction studies in the last two decades. Womens Strat Stud 2017;19:137-159. (Persian) [URL]
20. Brzozowska Z. Fertility and education in Poland during state socialism. Demogr Res 2014;31:319-36.
https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.12 [DOI:10.4054/demres.2014.31.12]
21. Daniluk J, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod 2015;30(2):353-63. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu328] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Mobasheri1 M, Alidousti M, Heidari Soureshjani S, Khosravi F, Khalafeyan P,Jalilian M. Determination of the Most Important Factors Influencing the Fertility Patterns of Single Child and Without Child Families in Shahr-e-kord City. Sci J Ilam Uni Med Sci 2013;21(6):63-70. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
23. GHasemi ardahari A, Rad F, Savabi H. Evaluationof Changes in female fertility in terms of socio-economic situation of couples. J Womens Strat Stud 2014;16(63):125. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
24. Keshavarz Mozafari H, Sharifirad G, Tavangarrad MR, Mardani Z. An investigation on sociodemographic factors influencing on fertility rate in Shahreza. J Health Syst Res 2014;10(1):66-76. (Persian) [URL]
25. Sadeghi H, Saraie H. Effective Factors on Mothers' Inclination to Have Children in Tehran. Soc Dev Welfare Plann 2016:8(27):1-32. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
26. Modiri F, Tanha F, Gilani N. Socio-economic Determinants of Childbearing Intention and Behavior among Men in Tehran. Q Soc Stud Res Iran 2021;10(4):1123-47. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
27. Shakeri Nejad G, Saki M, Haji Najaf S, Jarvandy F. Exploring the Point of View of Men and Women with Single Child on Childbearing in Ahvaz: a Qualitative Study. J Toloo-e-behdasht Sci 2016;15(5):81-94. (Persian) [URL]
28. Shams Gahfarokhi, F., Askari-Nodoushan, A., Eini-Zeinab, H., Ruhani, A., and Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. At the crossroad of decision to have children: an analysis of individual and social childbearing challenges in the context of low fertility in Isfahan. J Appl Soc 2023;33(4):1-28. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
29. Khadivzadeh, T, Arghavani, E, Shakeri, M. T. Relationship between Fertility Motivations and Preferences in Couples. Iran. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Infertil 2014;17(114):8-18. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
30. Akbari, S. & Shoaakazemi, M. Childbearing challenges in educated women with three or more children and motivational strategies. J Woman Family Stud 2023;10(4):81-103. [Google Scholar]
31. Motlagh M E, Taheri M, Eslami M, nasrollapour shirvani S D. Factors Affecting the Fertility Preferences in Iiranian Ethnic Groups. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2016;14(6):485-95. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
32. Abdollahi A, Farjadi G. Socio-economic rationality and childbearing behavior in Tehran City: Results from a qualitative study. Popular Policy Res 2016; 2(2):101-31. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
33. Mirabi S, Mirzaei H, Hassani Darmian GR. A phenomenological study on Married Women awareness of Childbearing. J Appl Soc 2020;31(3):1-20. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
34. Malakoutinia A, Nikouei Roozbehani ZS. An Evaluation of the Concept of the "Spouses Self-supporting" in Refusing Childbearing from the Islamic Viewpoint. Marifat J Syst 2021;280(30):21-34. (Persian)
35. Rahnama A, Roozbeh N, Salimi Asl A, Kazami Gerashi Z, Abbaszadeh M, Dabiri F. Factors Related to Childbearing in Iran: A Systematic Review. J Prevent Med 2022;9(1):6-17. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
36. Modiri F, Ghazi Tabatabai M. The effect of quality of marital life on intention of childbearing. J Soc Soc Inst 2018; 5 (12):73-94. (Persian) [URL]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Information
Address: Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Deputy of Research and Technology,Djahad Ave.,
Urmia-5714783734, IRAN
P.O. Box: 1138,
Tel: 044 - 331937224
Fax: 044 - 32240642
E-Mail:
j.nur.mid
gmail.com, unmfumsu.ac.ir