Volume 23, Issue 4 (Special Issue 2025)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2025, 23(4): 44-50 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: A-10-4835-1
Ethics code: IR.UMSU.REC.1400.331


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tataei A, Parizad N, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Alinejad V, Rahimi B. Impact of an Electronic Handover System on Nursing Handover Performance: A Comparison between ICU and General Wards. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2025; 23 (4) :44-50
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5533-en.html
1- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Patient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
4- Health and Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran & 1. Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , bahlol.rahimi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (199 Views)
Background: Ineffective clinical handover is a major contributor to communication failures and patient safety incidents. Electronic handover (e-handover) systems have been introduced to improve the accuracy and completeness of information transfer. However, comparative evidence regarding their performance across different clinical settings remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare nurses’ perceptions of handover performance in ICU and general wards following the implementation of an e-handover system.
Methods: This comparative study included 59 nurses, comprising 29 ICU nurses and 30 general ward nurses. Handover performance was assessed across five dimensions, handover quality, efficiency, error reduction, time saving, and patient safety. Baseline equivalence between groups was confirmed. The e-handover system was piloted following individual training, small-group 45-minute sessions, and WhatsApp coordination; nurses received unique logins and used the system concurrently with paper handover for two months under continuous supervision and technical support. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for group comparisons. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 26, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: After implementation of the e-handover system, ICU nurses reported significantly higher scores for handover quality (p = 0.016), efficiency (p < 0.001), time saving (p < 0.001), and patient safety (p < 0.001) compared with general ward nurses. Although error reduction scores were higher among ICU nurses, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.056).
Conclusion: Implementation of an e-handover system was associated with significant improvements across multiple dimensions of nursing handover performance, particularly in ICUs. These findings support the effectiveness of e-handover systems in enhancing communication efficiency and patient safety in high-acuity environments. Healthcare organizations should consider contextual differences between clinical settings and provide targeted training to optimize e-handover adoption in general wards.
Full-Text [PDF 366 kb]   (52 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Digital Nursing

References
1. 1. Blouin AS. Improving hand-off communications: new solutions for nurses. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26(2):97-100. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31820d4f57. [DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31820d4f57] [PMID]
2. Abdellatif A, Bagian JP, Barajas ER, Cohen M, Cousins D, Denham CR, et al. Communication during patient hand-overs: patient safety solutions, volume 1, solution 3, May 2007. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2007;33(7):439-42. [DOI:10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33128-0]
3. Bukoh MX, Siah CJR. A systematic review on the structured handover interventions between nurses in improving patient safety outcomes. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(3):744-55. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12936. [DOI:10.1111/jonm.12936] [PMID]
4. Akhu‐Zaheya L, Al‐Maaitah R, Bany Hani S. Quality of nursing documentation: Paper‐based health records versus electronic‐based health records. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(3-4):e578-e89. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14097. [DOI:10.1111/jocn.14097] [PMID]
5. Brand M, Boehm F, Kaisers UX, Fehling P, Hoffmann TK, Rotter N, et al. Bicentric evaluation of employee satisfaction, patient safety and treatment quality: comparing different Health Information System (HIS) solutions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):1470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13559-y. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-13559-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Mount-Campbell AF, Evans KD, Woods DD, Chipps E, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Patel K, et al. Uncovering the value of a historical paper-based collaborative artifact: The nursing unit's Kardex system. Front Digit Health. 2020;2:12. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00012. [DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2020.00012] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Bjerkan J, Valderaune V, Olsen RM. Patient safety through nursing documentation: Barriers identified by healthcare professionals and students. Frontiers in Computer Science. 2021;3:624555. doi:10.3389/fcomp.2021.624555. [DOI:10.3389/fcomp.2021.624555]
8. Agha-Mir-Salim L, Alberto IR, Alberto NR, Celi LA, Alfonso PG, Hicklen R, et al. Technological solutions to improve inpatient handover in the era of artificial intelligence: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e70358. doi: 10.2196/70358. [DOI:10.2196/70358] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Tataei A, Rahimi B, Afshar HL, Alinejad V, Jafarizadeh H, Parizad N. The effects of electronic nursing handover on patient safety in the general (non-COVID-19) and COVID-19 intensive care units: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09502-8. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09502-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Delardes B, McLeod L, Chakraborty S, Bowles K-A. What is the effect of electronic clinical handovers on patient outcomes? A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(4):2422-34. doi: 10.1177/1460458220905162. [DOI:10.1177/1460458220905162] [PMID]
11. Lee C-L, Lin W-T, Lin S-Y. Perceptions and experiences of hospital nurses during transition to an electronic handover informatics system. Comput Inform Nurs. 2019;37(11):591-8. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000554. [DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000554] [PMID]
12. Zhou J, Zhang F, Wang H, Yin Y, Wang Q, Yang L, et al. Quality and efficiency of a standardized e‐handover system for pediatric nursing: A prospective interventional study. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(8):3714-25. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13549. [DOI:10.1111/jonm.13549] [PMID]
13. Muñoz J, Muñoz-Visedo L, Moreno-Ortega E, Ribón-Liberal R, Muñoz-Visedo J. ICU command centres in critical care: Nursing workflows, organizational models, and implementation challenges. A narrative review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2026;92:104245. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104245. [DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104245] [PMID]
14. Tümer M, Aycan Z, Kılıçaslan B, Oruç ES, Akıncı SB. Teamwork effectiveness in intensive care units: development and validation of a brief and reliable assessment tool (TES-ICU). BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13432-y. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-13432-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Müller M, Jürgens J, Redaèlli M, Klingberg K, Hautz WE, Stock S. Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2018;8(8):e022202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Alharbi HF, Sayed SA, Abdelhafez KH, Mekkawy MM, Farrag RA, Mohamed SA, et al. Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2024;47(4):311-21. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000523. [DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000523] [PMID]
17. Jedwab RM, Pham AT, Qu Y, Brook R, Foster J, Garduce J-N, et al. Nurses' Adoption, Perceived Usability, and Satisfaction with an Updated Electronic Handover Page Within the Electronic Medical Record: A Mixed-Methods Study. Nurs Rep. 2025;15(10):369. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15100369. [DOI:10.3390/nursrep15100369] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Hada A, Jones LV, Jack LC, Coyer F. Translating evidence‐based nursing clinical handover practice in an acute care setting: A quasi‐experimental study. Nurs Health Sci. 2021;23(2):466-76. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12836. [DOI:10.1111/nhs.12836] [PMID]
19. Steinfeld E, Dahms K, Dormann J, Ansems K, Janka H, Inti-Metzendorf M, et al. Examining the impact of validated handover protocols on treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025;51(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02776-z. [DOI:10.1007/s00068-025-02776-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Pun J. Using a simulation-based approach to promote structured and interactive nursing clinical handover: a pre-and post-evaluation pilot study in bilingual Hong Kong. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01189-w. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01189-w] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Sanchez MPR. Streamlining Clinical Endorsement: Electronic Sbar-Integrated Clinical Handover Management Framework. Journal of Medical and Health Studies. 2026;7(1):20-8. doi:10.32996/jmhs.2026.7.1.4. [Google scholar] [DOI:10.32996/jmhs.2026.7.1.4]
22. Pankhurst T, Lucas L, Ryan S, Ragdale C, Gyves H, Denner L, et al. Benefits of electronic charts in intensive care and during a world health pandemic: advantages of the technology age. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001704. [DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001704] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Tisdale RL, Eggers Z, Shieh L. EMR-based handoff tool improves completeness of internal medicine residents' handoffs. BMJ Open Qual. 2018;7(3):e000188. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000188. [DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000188] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Al‐Shamaly HS. Patterns of communicating care and caring in the intensive care unit. Nurs Open. 2022;9(1):277-98. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1061. [DOI:10.1002/nop2.1061] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Zhang S, Quan YY, Chen J. Construction and application of an ICU nursing electronic medical record quality control system in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a prospective controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02178-3. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02178-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Guilbeault P, Momtahan K, Hudson J. Building an Electronic Handover Tool for Physicians Using a Collaborative Approach between Clinicians and the Development Team. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:153-9. [DOI:10.3233/978-1-61499-488-6-153] [PMID]
27. Choi J. Improving Emergency Department Throughput Using the Electronic Handoff Process: University of Maryland; 2026. [Google scholar]
28. Pérez-Martí M, Casadó-Marín L, Guillén-Villar A. Electronic records with tablets at the point of care in an internal medicine unit: before-after time motion study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(1):e30512. doi: 10.2196/30512. [DOI:10.2196/30512] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. McCarthy B, Fitzgerald S, O'Shea M, Condon C, Hartnett‐Collins G, Clancy M, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(3):491-501. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12727. [DOI:10.1111/jonm.12727] [PMID]
30. Lazzari C. Implementing the verbal and electronic handover in general and psychiatric nursing using the introduction, situation, background, assessment, and recommendation framework: a systematic review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024;29(1):23-32. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_24_23. [DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_24_23] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb