Volume 19, Issue 10 (January 2022)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022, 19(10): 783-792 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Parizad N, alizadeh Z, Jasemi M, Ahmadzadeh J. THE EFFECT OF DIRECT OBSERVATION OF PROCEDURAL SKILLS (DOPS) METHOD ON THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION OF NURSING STUDENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022; 19 (10) :783-792
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4390-en.html
THE EFFECT OF DIRECT OBSERVATION OF PROCEDURAL SKILLS (DOPS) METHOD ON THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION OF NURSING STUDENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS
Naser Parizad1 , Zahra Alizadeh * 2, Madineh Jasemi3 , Jamal Ahmadzadeh4
1- Assistant professor in Nursing, Patient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Nursing & Midwifery School, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Master of Science in Critical Care Nursing, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran (Corresponding Author) , alizadeh.1395.z@gmail.com
3- Assistant professor in Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- Master of Science in Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract:   (1670 Views)
Background & Aim: Using the best evaluation method is particularly important for students in intensive care lession. In this regard, direct observation of practical skills is one of the new clinical evaluation methods that allow students to receive constructive feedback. This study aimed to determine the effect of evaluation through direct observation of procedural skills on clinical performance and satisfaction of nursing students in intensive care units. Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 64 nursing students studying in the 7th semester of bachelor's degree in Urmia nursing school. Students were randomly divided into intervention (32 individuals 15 male students and 17 female students) and control (32 individuals 13 male students and 19 female students) groups. In the intervention group, the evaluation was performed by direct observation of procedural skilling methods including dressing change, intravenous (IV) line insertion, and suctioning activities of students on the first day, one week later, and two weeks later. In all three stages of the evaluation, students gave feedback for fifteen minutes. In the control group, evaluation was performed by the logbook method. In both groups, standard checklists were provided to the students. SPSS software version 19 and Student T-test and repeated measures analysis of variance were used in data analysis. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: The final score of the dressing change in the intervention group was higher than the control group (P
Keywords: Students, Nursing, Evaluation, DOPS
Full-Text [PDF 398 kb]   (721 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: پرستاری
References
1. Vahabi S, Ebadi A, Rahmani R, Tavallaei A, Khatouni A, Tadrisi S, et al. Comparison of the status of clinical education in the views of nursing educators and students. Edu Strateg Med Sci 2011;3(4):179-82. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
2. Lisko SA, O'dell V. Integration of theory and practice: Experiential learning theory and nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect 2010;31(2):106-8. [PMID]
3. Esmaeili M, Cheraghi MA, Salsali M, Ghiyasvandian S. Nursing students' expectations regarding effective clinical education: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Prac 2014;20(5):460-7. [DOI:10.1111/ijn.12159] [PMID]
4. Ironside PM, McNelis AM, Ebright P. Clinical education in nursing: Rethinking learning in practice settings. Nurs Outlook 2014;62(3):185-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2013.12.004] [PMID]
5. Asirifi M, Ogilvie L, Barton S, Aniteye P, Stobart K, Bilash O, et al. Assessing challenges of clinical education in a baccalaureate nursing program in Ghana. J Nurs Educ Pract 2017;7(10):109-18. [DOI:10.5430/jnep.v7n10p109]
6. Tyo MB, McCurry MK. An integrative review of clinical reasoning teaching strategies and outcome evaluation in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect 2019;40(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000375] [PMID]
7. Fitzpatrick JL, Sanders JR, Worthen BR. Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. 3th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2004. [URL]
8. Holmboe ES, Durning SJ, Hawkins RE. Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017. [URL]
9. Azizi M, Barati H, Khamse F, Barati M. The effect of log book design and implementation on students' satisfaction and performance during a nursing internship course in a military psychiatric hospital. Ebnesina 2016;18(2):55-60. (Persian) [URL]
10. Nesami M, Rafiee F, Parvizi S, Esmaeili R. Concept analysis of competency in nursing: Qualitative research. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2008;18(67):35-42. (Persian) [URL]
11. Sadeghi T, Seyed Bagheri SH. Challenges of teacher-based clinical evaluation from nursing students' point of view: Qualitative content analysis. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:72. [PMCID]
12. Imanipour M, Jalili M. Nursing students' clinical evaluation in students and teachers views. Iran J Nurs Res 2012;7(25):17-26. [URL]
13. Pishkar Mofrad Z, Navidian A, Robabi H. An assessment of traditional and objective structured practical evaluation methods on satisfaction of nursing students in Zahedan Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery: A comparing. J Med Educ Dev 2013;7(4):2-14. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
14. Eldarir SA, El Sebaae HA, El Feky HA, Hussein H, El Fadil N, El Shaeer I. An introduction of OSCE versus traditional method in nursing education: Faculty capacity building and students' perspectives. J Am Sci 2010;6:1002-14. [Google Scholar]
15. Moghadam MZ, Yazdanparast E, Hosseiny SF, Chenari HA. A Review of New Methods Assessment in Clinical Education of Medical Science Students. Edu Strateg Med Sci 2020;14(3):92-102. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
16. A.McLeod R, Mires GJ, S.Ker J. The use of the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) assessment tool in the clinical setting - the perceptions of students. Int J Clin Ski 2011;5(2):77-82. [URL]
17. Bindal N, Goodyear H, Bindal T, Wall D. DOPS assessment: A study to evaluate the experience and opinions of trainees and assessors. Med Teach 2013;35(6): e1230-e1234. [DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.746447] [PMID]
18. Erfani Khanghahi M, Ebadi Fard Azar F. Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) evaluation method: Systematic review of evidence. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2018;32:45-. [DOI:10.14196/mjiri.32.45] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Loerwald AC, Lahner F-M, Nouns ZM, Berendonk C, Norcini J, Greif R, et al. The educational impact of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) and its association with implementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 2018;13(6):e0198009. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0198009] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Bari V. Updating Teaching and Learning Methodologies in Radiology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014;24(7):519-22. [PMID]
21. Taghadosi m, Hosieini f, Akbary a. The process of changing the final assessment of students in the intensive care unit from the traditional way to a practical test with an objective structure. Edu Ethics Nurs 2016;5(3):21-6. (Persian) [DOI:10.52547/ethicnurs.5.3.5]
22. Habibi H, Khaghanizade M, Mahmoodi H, Ebadi A. Comparison of the effects of modern assessment methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) with traditional method on nursing students' clinical skills: A randomized trial. Iran J Med Sci 2013;13(5):364-72. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
23. Latifi m, Shaban m, Nikbakht a, Mehran a, Parsa yekta z. Comparison of the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods: Portfolio and popular, on satisfaction of nurse students. Iran J Nurs Res 2011;6(21):15-28. (Persian) [URL]
24. Elsevier. Clinical Skills: Essentials Collection. 1st Ed: Elsevier; 2016. [URL]
25. Nooreddini A, Sedaghat S, Sanagu A, Hoshyari H, Cheraghian B. Effect of clinical skills evaluation applied by direct observation clinical skills (DOPS) on the clinical performance of junior nursing students.J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2015;12(1):8-16. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
26. Farajpour A, Amini M, Pishbin E, Mostafavian Z, Akbari Farmad S. Using Modified Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) to assess undergraduate medical students.J Adv Med Educ Prof 2018;6(3):130-6. [PMCID]
27. Jasemi M, Ahangarzadeh Rezae Si, Hemmati M, Madadipoor N, Cheraghi R. Evaluation of the effect of evaluation using the direct observation skills (DOPS) and traditional methods on nursing students' clinical skills learning, 2016. Razi J Med Sci 2019;25(10):1-9. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
28. Valizadeh S, Mohammadpour Y, Parvan K, Lakdizaji S. The Effect of Outcome-Based Education on Nursing Students' Clinical Competency. Iran J Med Edu 2009; 9(2): 157-166. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
29. Jenkins A, Unwin D. How to write learning outcomes. 2001. [URL]
30. Liaqat A, Saima A, Nasir O, Naila A. Effectiveness of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) in Postgraduate Training in Urology at Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2019;29(6):516-9. 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.516 [DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.516] [PMID]
31. Hoseini BL, Mazloum SR, Jafarnejad F, Foroughipour M. Comparison of midwifery students' satisfaction with direct observation of procedural skills and current methods in evaluation of procedural skills in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013;18(2):94. [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Singh G, Kaur R, Mahajan A, Thomas AM, Singh T. Piloting direct observation of procedural skills in dental education in India. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2017;7(4):239-42. [DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_54_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Asadi K, Mirbolook A, Haghighi M, Sedighinejad A, Abedi S, Dehsara F. Evaluation of Satisfaction Level of Orthopedic Interns from Direct Observation of procedural Skills Assessment (DOPS). Res Med Edu 2012;4(2):17-23. (Persian) [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.4.2.17]
34. Yoon K, Charles LB, Linda MG, Carol S-J. Pilot of direct observation of clinical skills (DOCS) in a medicine clerkship: feasibility and relationship to clinical performance measures. Med Educ Online 2009;14(1):4519. [DOI:10.3402/meo.v14i.4519]
35. Farajpour A, Amini M, Pishbin E, Arshadi H, Sanjarmusavi N, Yousefi J, et al. Teachers' and Students' Satisfaction with DOPS Examination in Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, a Study in Year 2012. Iran J Med Edu 2014;14(2):165-73. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb