Volume 18, Issue 8 (November 2020)
Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2020, 18(8): 653-661 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Associate Professor, Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran (Corresponding author) , jabraily@gmail.com
2- Professor, Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract: (2674 Views)
Background & Aims: Support services are the key element in the lifecycle of information systems and their effective use by users. In fact, proper support services can increase the reliability, security, and cost-effectiveness of the information system and ensure the success of implementation and user satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate users' perceptions of the quality of support services provided by hospital information systems in the educational and treatment centers of Urmia University of Medical Sciences.
Materials & Methods: This is a qualitative study that was conducted in 2020. The study population included HIS users in the educational and medical centers of Urmia University of Medical Sciences who were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured individual and face-to-face interviews. Data analysis was performed through content analysis using MAXQDA software.
Results: A total of 19 HIS users from different job categories were interviewed. The content analysis results of these interviews showed that the most important support services of HIS vendors include: fixing system technical problems, meeting new user needs, training on how to use the system, updating and upgrading the system, protecting information confidentiality and system security, as well as the skills and competence of company support staff.
Conclusion: Hospitals should carefully evaluate the quality of support services after the implementation of HIS from the perspective of end-users and focus on issues such as providing proper and timely support services, prioritizing user problems, considering new hospital needs, and upgrading HIS and maintaining system security by HIS vendors.
Type of Study: Qualitative |
Subject:
مدیریت پرستاری
References
1. Feiz D, Kohyari Haghighat A, Kohyari Haghighat K. The Role of Quality Improvement of Services in Promoting Brand Performance in Tehran Hospitals. Payavard 2017; 11(3):53-65. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
2. Rahimi B, Safdari R, Jebraeily M. Development of hospital information systems: user participation and factors affecting it. Acta Inform Med 2014; 22(6):398-401. [DOI:10.5455/aim.2014.22.398-401] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Dehghan Nayeri N, Mohammadi Firouzeh M, Seylani K. Nurses' experiences of the hospital information systems. Hayat 2015; 20(4):5-18. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
4. Tavakoli N, Jahanbakhsh M, Yadegarfard G, Ranjbar N. Acceptance and Use of Hospital Information System: A Study on Medical Records Users Based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics 2017; 3 (4):243-50. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
5. Carvalho JV, Rocha Á, van de Wetering R, Abreu A. A Maturity model for hospital information systems. J Bus Res 2019; 94:388-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.012]
6. Hamborg KC, Vehse B, Bludau HB. Questionnaire based usability evaluation of hospital information systems. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 2004; 7(1): 21-30. [Google Scholar]
7. Rouzbahani R, Mozaffarian M, Kazempour Dizadji M. The effect of hospital information system application on healthcare services promotion at Masih-Daneshvari Hospital. Payavard 2012;6(2):128-37. (Persian) [Google Scholar]
8. Al-Nashmi ME. The role of vendors in health information systems implementation: assessing the perception of healthcare executives and vendors. University of Pittsburgh; 2003. [Google Scholar]
9. Candell O, Karim R, Söderholm P. eMaintenance-Information logistics for maintenance support. Integrated Manufacturing 2009;25(6):937-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.005]
10. Ismail A, Jamil AT, Rahman AFA, Bakar JMA, Saad NM, Saadi H. The implementation of Hospital Information System (HIS) in tertiary hospitals in malaysia: a qualitative study. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2010;10(2):16-24. [Google Scholar]
11. Khalifa M. Technical and human challenges of implementing hospital information systems in Saudi Arabia. J Health Inform Dev Ctries 2014;8(1). [Google Scholar]
12. Ajami S, Mohammadi-Bertiani Z. Training and its impact on hospital information system (HIS) success. J Inf Technol Softw Eng 2012;2(112). [DOI:10.4172/2165-7866.1000112]
13. Kasiri LA, Cheng KTG, Sambasivan M, Sidin SM. Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. J Retail Consum Serv 2017;35:91-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.007]
14. Torkashvand G. Recognizing the items of after sales services quality and Exploring the relationships among these items and customer satisfaction in Informatics Services Corporation. Iranian Business Management 2011; 2(4): 83-96. [Google Scholar]
15. Asugman G, Johnson JL, McCullough J. The role of after-sales service in international marketing. J Int Mark 1997;5(4):11-28. [DOI:10.1177/1069031X9700500403]
16. Gaiardelli P, Saccani N, Songini L. Performance measurement systems in after-sales service: an integrated framework. International Journal of Business Performance Management 2007;9(2):145. [DOI:10.1504/IJBPM.2007.011860]
17. Grönroos C. A service quality model and its marketing implications. Eur J Mark 1984;18(4):36-44. [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000004784]
18. Cohen MA, Lee HL. Out of touch with customer needs? Spare parts and after sales service. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 1990;31(2):55. [Google Scholar]
19. Rahman NAA, Mohamad B, Rahman NAA. Factors Influencing the Quality of e-Services on Hospital Information System (HIS) in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2014;155:507-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.331]
20. Ives B, Vitale MR. After the sale: leveraging maintenance with information technology. MIS Quarterly 1988:7-21. [DOI:10.2307/248797]
21. Khalifa M, Alswailem O. Hospital information systems (HIS) acceptance and satisfaction: A case study of a tertiary care hospital. Procedia Comput Sci 2015;63:198-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.334]
22. Chang C-S, Chen S-Y, Lan Y-T. Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence-based practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12(1):1. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-12-135] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Peng F, Kurnia S. Understanding Hospital Information Systems Adoption in China. PACIS; 2010. [Google Scholar]
24. Ehteshami, A, Raeisi, A, & Rashedi, M. Key Performance Indicators of Benchmarking in Hospital Information Systems. Health Inf Manage 2018; 15(1), 3-11. [Google Scholar]
25. Tam MC, Tummala VR. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 2001;29(2):171-82. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6]
26. Amiresmaili M, Zarei L, Sheibani E, Arabpur A. Evaluation of the Indicators of Hospital Information System. Health Inf Manage 2013; 10(1): 3-15. [Google Scholar]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |