Volume 21, Issue 5 (8-2023)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2023, 21(5): 366-374 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shafiei M R, Saadati M, Shirani F, Moradi M, Niknezhad R, Akbari M. EVALUATION OF MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE BASED ON 360-DEGREE EVALUATION MODEL IN HEAD NURSES OF SHAHID CHAMRAN HEART TRAINING AND MEDICAL CENTER IN ISFAHAN IN 2021. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2023; 21 (5) :366-374
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4516-en.html
1- Ph.D. student of government management, Isfahan Cardiology Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Master's student in public administration, Isfahan Cardiology and Vascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- PhD in Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Master's student in nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Student Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
5- Master of Science in Operating Room, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran
6- PhD in Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author) , akbari129@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1771 Views)
Background & Aim: Hospital managers, especially ward heads, have an irreplaceable role in improving the quality of hospitals to provide appropriate health services to the people. Having an efficient and effective evaluation system to recognize the competencies and abilities of hospital managers can play an important role in providing higher quality services in health care organizations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of nurses at Shahid Chamran Hospital in Isfahan using a 360-degree evaluation method.
Materials & Methods: The present cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 20 nurses of Shahid Chamran Center in Isfahan in 1400 by census method. The data collection tool was a 360-degree performance evaluation checklist. In this process, each head nurse was examined from all angles and all unit managers (superiors) and subordinates (nurse, assistant, staff, ward secretary) were evaluated. The overall score of this checklist was from zero to one hundred and its evaluation dimensions were generally weak in the three areas of clinical leadership, clinical accreditation and training (average score below 70) and modifiable (average score 70 to 80) and acceptable. (Average score above 80). Data in each domain were analyzed by SPSS software version 23.
Results: According to the results obtained from the 360-degree evaluation checklist of nurses, 3.75% of nurses in the field of clinical leadership received a poor score, 38.75% a modifiable score and 56.25% an acceptable score. In the field of clinical accreditation, 7.9% of the head nurses received a poor score, 32.26% a modifiable score and 60.12% an acceptable score. In the field of clinical education, 5% of the head nurses received a poor score, 25.21% a modifiable score and 75.73% an acceptable score.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it was found that the performance of a number of head nurses was poor in some aspects and needed to be corrected. Hospital managers, especially nursing managers, should take the necessary action to correct their weaknesses and shortcomings while promoting their nurses. Therefore, continuous evaluation using a 360-degree performance evaluation checklist of head nurses in all medical centers is recommended.
Full-Text [PDF 615 kb]   (1439 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: مدیریت پرستاری

References
1. Bayrami R, Rezazadeh A. Challenges in emergency departments in teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences A qualitative study. Hospital 2017;16:63-72. [URL]
2. Nikokar S, Ketabi S, Moazam E. A Combined model of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytical heirarchy process (AHP)in ranking of hospitals managers. Heal Inf Manag 2011;7:601-11. [Google Scholar]
3. Taslimi MS, Zayandeh M. challenges of hospital performance assessment system development:literature review. Hakim Res J 2013;16:35-41. [Google Scholar]
4. Meretoja R, Leino-Kilpi H. Comparison of competence assessments made by nurse managers and practising nurses. J Nurs Manag 2003;11:404-9. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00413.x] [PMID]
5. Shafii M, Rafiei S, Abooee F, Bahrami MA, Nouhi M, Lotfi F, et al. Assessment of Service Quality in Teaching Hospitals of Yazd University of Medical Sciences: Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect 2016;7:239-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.phrp.2016.05.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Pezeshki A, Almasian A, Salehi S, Zahabi F, Jahanfar M, Amraei H, et al. Performance Evaluation Criteria for Hospitals' Managers: A Qualitative Study. Evid Based Heal Policy, Manag Econ 2019;3:52-65. [DOI:10.18502/jebhpme.v3i1.582]
7. Mark BA. The emerging role of the nurse manager: Implications for educational preparation. J Nurs Adm 1994;24:48-55. [DOI:10.1097/00005110-199401000-00013] [PMID]
8. Liu M, Kunaiktikul W, Senaratana W, Tonmukayakul O, Eriksen L. Development of competency inventory for registered nurses in the people's republic of china: Scale development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:805-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.010] [PMID]
9. Mosadeghrad AM, Abbasi M. Performance of the Nursing Managers in the Hospitals in Sari, Iran. Iran J Nurs 2019;31:62-74. [DOI:10.29252/ijn.31.115.62]
10. Feather RA, Ebright P, Bakas T. Nurse Manager Behaviors That RNs Perceive to Affect Their Job Satisfaction. Nurs Forum. 2015;50:125-36. [DOI:10.1111/nuf.12086] [PMID]
11. Mosadeghrad A. Essentials of healthcare organisation and management. 2015. [URL]
12. Benzer JK, Beehler S, Miller C, Burgess JF, Sullivan JL, Mohr DC, et al. Grounded Theory of Barriers and Facilitators to Mandated Implementation of Mental Health Care in the Primary Care Setting. Depress Res Treat 2012;2012:1-11. [DOI:10.1155/2012/597157] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Rabarison K, Ingram RC, Holsinger JW. Application of situational leadership to the national voluntary public health accreditation process. Front Public Heal 2013;1:26. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2013.00026] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Rad AMM, Yarmohammadian MH. A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2006;19. [DOI:10.1108/13660750610665008] [PMID]
15. Mosadeghrad A, Ferdosi M. Leadership, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Healthcare Sector: Proposing and Testing a Model. Mater Socio Medica 2013;25:121. [DOI:10.5455/msm.2013.25.121-126] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Pillay R. The skills gap in hospital management: A comparative analysis of hospital managers in the public and private sectors in South Africa. Heal Serv Manag Res 2010;23:30-6. [DOI:10.1258/hsmr.2009.009015] [PMID]
17. Liang Z, Leggat SG, Howard PF, Koh L. What makes a hospital manager competent at the middle and senior levels. Aust Heal Rev 2013;37:566-73. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH12004 [DOI:10.1071/ah12004] [PMID]
18. Kanaslan EK, Iyem C. Is 360 Degree Feedback Appraisal an Effective Way of Performance Evaluation? Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 2016;6. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i5/2124 [DOI:10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i5/2124]
19. Massagli TL, Carline JD. Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:845-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318151ff5a [DOI:10.1097/phm.0b013e318151ff5a] [PMID]
20. Sadeghi T, Loripoor M. Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran. Korean J Med Educ 2016;28:195-200. [DOI:10.3946/kjme.2016.22] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Goldstein R, Zuckerman B. A Perspective on 360-Degree Evaluations. J Pediatr 2010;156:1-2.e2. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.027] [PMID]
22. London M, Beatty RW. 360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Hum Resour Manage 1993;32:353-72. [DOI:10.1002/hrm.3930320211]
23. Thach EC. The impact of executive coaching and 360 feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Organ Dev J 2002;23:205-14. [DOI:10.1108/01437730210429070]
24. Meghdad R, Nayereh R, Zahra S, Houriye Z, Reza N. Assessment of the performance of nurses based on the 360-degree model and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method (FMCDM) and selecting qualified nurses. Heliyon 2020;6. [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03257] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Nakhaee N, Saeed AR. 360degree Evaluation Method in Clinical Evaluation of Residents: a Pilot Study on Feasibility Validity and Reliability. Strides Dev Med Educ 2011;7:99-103. [URL]
26. Feyzolah AH, Hojat Z, Saeid K, Mohammad A, Marziye AM. The role of training managers and decision-making network in evaluating the new appraisal system of government employees in Isfahan hospitals. Health Inf Manag 2011;8:681-9. [Google Scholar]
27. Ghamari Zare Z, Purfarzad Z, Anoosheh M, Seraji A, Ghorbani M. The correlation between quality of performance appraisal and job satisfaction of nurses. Q J Nurs Manag 2013;1(4):18-27. [Google Scholar]
28. Emamzadeh Ghasemi HS, Vanaky Z, Dehghan nayeri N, Salehi T, Salsali M, Faghihzadeh S. Management by Objective Approach in Nursing Performance Appraisal and its Impact on Quality of Nursing Care. Tums-Hayat 2007;13:5-15. [Google Scholar]
29. Tavakkol Z, Hassan Zahraie R, Bashardoust N. The performance evaluation of BS nursing graduates based on their own perspectives and their head nurses in the hospitals affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2001. Iran J Med Sci 2001;1(4):44-51. [Google Scholar]
30. Sudin S. Fairness of and satisfaction with performance appraisal process. J Glob Manag 2011;2:66-83. [Google Scholar]
31. Marquis BL, Huston CJ. Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application. 2017. [Google Scholar]
32. Modic MB, Schloesser M. Preceptorship. J Nurses Staff Dev 2006;22:96-7. [DOI:10.1097/00124645-200603000-00011] [PMID]
33. Robbins SP, A. Timothy A. Judge. Organizational Behavior. 18th ed. New York, NY : Pearson.2019; 2019. [Google Scholar]
34. Pazargadi M, Afzali M, Javadzadeh Z, Alavi Majd H. A propositional model for head nurse's performance appraisal in university hospitals of tehran. Pajouhesh Dar Pezeshki 2005;29:187-93. [Google Scholar]
35. Zaboli R, Delgoshaei B, Haghani H. Assessing the Performance Appraisal System at General Hospitals Affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences, 2004-2005. J Health Admin 2005;8:117-22. [Google Scholar]
36. Heroabadi MA. Management of nursing & midwifery. tehran Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services Publisher; 2006. [URL]
37. Taghavi T, Yekta Z, Kazemnejad A, Mazaheri A. Outcome of the Performance Appraisal and Its relation with Nurses Job Motivation. Hayat 2007;12:39-46. [Google Scholar]
38. Giangreco A, Carugati A, Sebastiano A, Tamimi H Al. War outside, ceasefire inside: An analysis of the performance appraisal system of a public hospital in a zone of conflict. Eval Program Plann 2012;35:161-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.11.004] [PMID]
39. Redshaw G. Improving the performance appraisal system for nurses. Nurs Times 2008;104:30-1.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb