Volume 20, Issue 3 (June 2022)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022, 20(3): 251-257 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Badali B, Delirrad M, Boushehri B, Jebraeily M. EVALUATION OF THE USABILITY OF DRUG ABUSE REGISTRATION SYSTEM FROM THE USERS’ POINT OF VIEW AT URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2022; 20 (3) :251-257
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4683-en.html
EVALUATION OF THE USABILITY OF DRUG ABUSE REGISTRATION SYSTEM FROM THE USERS’ POINT OF VIEW AT URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN
Borhan Badali1 , Mohammad Delirrad2 , Behzad Boushehri3 , Mohamad Jebraeily * 4
1- MSc student, Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Associate Professor of Clinical Toxicology and Poisoning, Food and Beverage Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Forensic Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- Associate Professor of Health Information Management, Health and Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran (Corresponding author) , jabraeili.m@umsu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1135 Views)
Background & Aims: Development of the registry system for substance abuse poisoning may be useful in the systematic collection of information, prevention of poisonings, identification of people and monitoring them, ease of access to information, and decision-making in allocating resources. Evaluation of the usability of information systems is one of the most important ways to improve disease registration programs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usability of drug abuse registration system from the users' point of view at Urmia University of Medical Sciences. Materials & Methods: This study was a cross-sectional descriptive one conducted in 2022. In this study, the opinions of 21 system users were evaluated. Census sampling method was done from the cases reffered to the Imam Khomeini Educational and Medical Center in Urmia, Iran. Data collection tool was a standard QUIS questionnaire with 32 questions in 6 dimensions including: general interaction with the system, screen, system terms, learning ability, general capabilities of the system, and usability and user interface. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 software. Results: The results showed that the average score obtained in the six dimensions of the usability evaluation of the registry system for substance abuse poisoning were: 8.52 in system terms, 8.36 in screen, 8.28 in learning ability, 8.04 in general capabilities of the system, 7.98 in usability and user interface, and 7.73 in the general interaction, respectively. Conclusion: From the user's point of view, working with the registry system for substance abuse poisoning is simple and easy to learn, and the screen and system terms are appropriate. However, the users were relatively satisfied with the capabilities of system configuration capabilities and its reports. Therefore, the designed system requires some changes to improve the quality of reports.  
Keywords: Usability, Registration system, Substance abuse, User interface, User satisfaction
Full-Text [PDF 538 kb]   (369 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: پزشکی
References
1. Salmond S, Allread V. A Population Health Approach to America's Opioid Epidemic. Orthop Nurs 2019;38(2): 95-108. [DOI:10.1097/NOR.0000000000000521] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Murthy VH. Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Jama 2017;317(2): 133-4. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.18215] [PMID]
3. Ritchie H, Roser M. Substance Use. Our World in Data. 2018.Mathers C. The global burden of disease: 2004 update: World Health Organization; 2008. [Google Scholar]
4. Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Compton W, et al. Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61(8): 807-16. [DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807] [PMID]
5. Mokri A. Brief overview of the status of drug abuse in Iran. Arch Iran Med 2002;5(3): 184-90. [Google Scholar]
6. Ajami S, Mellat-Karkevandi Z. The advantages and barriers in the implementation of a substance dependence treatment information system (SDTIS). J Res Med Sci 2015;20(11): 1105. [DOI:10.4103/1735-1995.172842] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Sajjadi M, Shariatifar N, Matlabi M, Abbasnezhad A, Basiri K, Nazemi H. The rate of knowledge and attitude toward psychoactive drugs and its abuse prevalence in Gonabad University students. Horizon Med Sci 2009;15(2): 58-64. [Google Scholar]
8. Damari B, Pishkuhi MA, Masoudiasl I, Bostanmanesh G. Interventions to Reduce Drug Abuse in Pars Special Economic Energy Zone. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015;17(11): e32016. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.32016] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Wallis DJ. Adolescent substance abuse treatment: Does family systems therapy improve family functioning and decrease substance abuse?: University of Denver; 2013. [Google Scholar]
10. Oder M, Põld K. Estonian experience on establishment of a modern national poison information centre: one-year profile of phone calls in 2012. Asia Pac J Med Toxicol 2013;2(2): 42-7. [Google Scholar]
11. Vassilev ZP, Chu AF, Ruck B, Adams EH, Marcus SM. Evaluation of adverse drug reactions reported to a poison control center between 2000 and 2007. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009;66(5): 481-7. [DOI:10.2146/ajhp080267] [PMID]
12. Schuckit MA. Drug and alcohol abuse: A clinical guide to diagnosis and treatment: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006. [Google Scholar]
13. Deputy of Research and Technology MoH, Iran. Disease Registry Introduction. 2015: 1-15. [URL]
14. Bush H, Charnigo R. Collecting Health Information: Disease Registry, Product Registry, or Neither. J Biom Biostat 2011;2: 103e. [DOI:10.4172/2155-6180.1000103e]
15. Rotondi NK, Rush B. Monitoring utilization of a large scale addiction treatment system: The Drug and Alcohol Treatment Information System (DATIs). Subst Abuse 2012;6: SART-9617. [DOI:10.4137/SART.S9617] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Camp JM, Krakow M, McCarty D, Argeriou M. Substance abuse treatment management information systems: Balancing federal, state, and service provider needs. J Ment Health Adm 1992;19(1): 5-20. [DOI:10.1007/BF02521303] [PMID]
17. SAMS [Internet]. Dphhs.mt.gov. [cited 2022 Sep 19]. Available from: https: //dphhs.mt.gov/amdd/substanceabuse/sams
18. Jeddi FR, Nabovati E, Bigham R, Khajouei R. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics. Int J Med Inform 2020;133: 104026. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104026] [PMID]
19. Vlachogianni P, Tselios N. Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. J Res Technol Educ 2021;25: 1-8. [Google Scholar]
20. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In CHI '88 Conference Proceedings. Hum Factors Computing Sys 1988: 213-8. [DOI:10.1145/57167.57203] [PMID]
21. Rotaru OA, Vert S, Vasiu R, Andone D. Standardised questionnaires in usability evaluation. applying standardised usability questionnaires in digital products evaluation. In: International Conference on Information and Software Technologies. Springer; 2020. p. 39-48. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-59506-7_4]
22. Zaharias P, Poylymenakou A. Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. Intl. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2009; 25(1): 75-98. [DOI:10.1080/10447310802546716]
23. Damanabi S, Monaghesh E, Faraji R. Usability of laboratory information system in Tabriz educational hospitals from user's perspective. J Modern Med Info Sci 2019;5(1): 60-5. [DOI:10.29252/jmis.5.1.60]
24. Ghaffari F, Jeddi FR, Farrahi R, Nabovati E. Design, development, and evaluation of an interactive training simulator for teaching hospital information systems. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10(205): 1-7. [URL]
25. Mousavi SM, Karimi A, Zakeriyan SA, Mehravar M. Producing and Introducing a Computer Software for Evaluating Performance of Permit to Work System [Google Scholar]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb