Volume 19, Issue 2 (May 2021)                   Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2021, 19(2): 109-118 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseinzadegan F, Azimzadeh R, Parizad N, Esmaeili R, Alinejad V, Hemmati Maslakpak M. PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE- REVISED FORM )DSMQ-R) IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2021; 19 (2) :109-118
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4190-en.html
1- PhD Candidate in Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Lecturer, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
5- Associate Professor, Maternal and Childhood Obesity Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran (Corresponding Author) , hemmatma@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1495 Views)
Background & Aims: The progressive nature and chronic complications of diabetes provide complex conditions that require special attention to change health behaviors, including self-management, and achieving it requires the use of valid instruments. The aim of this study was to translate and assess the psychometric properties of the diabetes self-management questionnaire- Revised form )DSMQ-R). Materials & Methods: This psychometric evaluation of the “diabetes self-management questionnaire- Revised form” used a methodological study design. Using convenience sampling, a total of 180 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes from the Diabetes Association and two teaching hospitals in Urmia entered the study. The original version of the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-R was translated from English to Persian language using the Backward-Forward translation method. The validity of the instrument was determined by assessing face validity, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability of the instrument was reported by the Alpha Cronbach coefficient. The SPSS (v. 16) and LISREL were used to analyze the data. Results: According to the results of confirmatory factor analysis, all of the factor loading items were significant and the 4 subscales of the original instrument were verified with acceptable scores. The internal reliability of the total scale was determined by the alpha Cronbach coefficient (0.88) and it was 0.66-0.85 for the subscales. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the Persian version of “Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire- Revised form” with 27 items is a valid and reliable instrument and it can be used as a reliable instrument in patients with diabetes.
Full-Text [PDF 667 kb]   (1513 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: متفرقه

References
1. Raaijmakers Lg, Martens Mk, Bagchus C, De Weerdt I, De Vries Nk, Kremers Sp. correlates of perceived self-care activities and diabetes control among Dutch type 1 and type 2 diabetics. J behav med 2015;38(3):450-9. [DOI:10.1007/s10865-014-9609-y] [PMID]
2. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th edition 2019 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/
3. Khakzadi H, Morshedi H. association between health literacy and theory of planned behavior with self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetic patients. j torbat heydariyeh uni med sci 2019;6(4):33-46. [Google Scholar]
4. Mutyambizi C, Pavlova M, Chola L, Hongoro C, Groot W. cost of diabetes mellitus in africa: a systematic review of existing literature. Glob Health J 2018;14(1):3. [DOI:10.1186/s12992-017-0318-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Luo L, Pang B, Chen J, Li Y, Xie X. assessing the impact of lifestyle interventions on diabetes prevention in china: a modeling approach. International J Environ Public Health 2019;16(10):1677. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16101677] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Association Ad. 4. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes care 2018;41(supplement 1):s38-50. [DOI:10.2337/dc18-S004] [PMID]
7. Noh J-H, Cho Y-J, Nam H-W, Kim J-H, Kim D-J, Yoo H-S, et al. web-based comprehensive information system for self-management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther J 2010;12(5):333-7. [DOI:10.1089/dia.2009.0122] [PMID]
8. Mcgowan P. self-management: a background paper. In new perspectives: international conference on patient self-management; 2005. [URL]
9. Lee AA, Piette JD, Heisler M, Janevic MR, Rosland A-M. Diabetes self-management and glycemic control: the role of autonomy support from informal health supporters. J Health Psychol 2019;38(2):122. [DOI:10.1037/hea0000710] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Toobert Dj, Hampson Se, Glasgow Re. the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care J 2000;23(7):943-50. [DOI:10.2337/diacare.23.7.943] [PMID]
11. Lin Cc, Anderson Rm, Chang Cs, Hagerty Bm, Loveland‐Cherry Cj. development and testing of the diabetes self‐management instrument: a confirmatory analysis. J Res Nurs 2008;31(4):370-80. [DOI:10.1002/nur.20258] [PMID]
12. Sousa VD, Hartman Sw, Miller Eh, Carroll Ma. New measures of diabetes self‐care agency, diabetes self‐efficacy, and diabetes self‐management for insulin‐treated individuals with type 2 diabetes. j cli nurs 2009;18(9):1305-12. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02729.x] [PMID]
13. Ghiyasvandian S, Salimi A, Navidhamidi M, Ebrahimi H. assessing the effect of self-management education on quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Know and Health J 2017:12(1); 50-56. [URL]
14. Thojampa S, Mawn B. psychometric evaluation of the Thai translation of the diabetes self-management questionnaire in type 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Sci 2017;4(3):236-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Bukhsh A, Lee Swh, Pusparajah P, Schmitt A, Khan Tm. psychometric properties of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (dsmq) in urdu. Health Qual Life Outcomes J 2017;15(1):200. [DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0776-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Huber J, Haak T. the diabetes self-management questionnaire (dsmq): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health qual life outcomes j 2013;11(1):138. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-11-138] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Tol A, Shojaezadeh D, Eslami A, Alhani F, Mohajeri Tm, Sharifirad Gr. analyses of some relevant predictors on self-management of type 2 diabetic patients.hospital jur 2011;10(3): 1-8. [DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.99219] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Reisi M, Mostafavi F, Javadzade H, Mahaki B, Tavassoli E, Sharifirad G. communicative and critical health literacy and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Iran j diabetes and metab 2016 mar 15;14(3):199-208. [Google Scholar]
19. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications; 2015. [Google Scholar]
20. Waltz Cf, Bausell RB. nursing research: design, statistics, and computer analysis. Fa Davis co; 1981. [URL]
21. Polit DF, Beck CT: the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006;29:489-97 [DOI:10.1002/nur.20147] [PMID]
22. Naderimagham S, Niknami S, Abolhassani F, Hajizadeh E. development and psychometric properties of perceived self-efficacy scale (SES) for self-care in middle-aged patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Payesh health monit j 2013;12 (6);679-90. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1035] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Litwin MS. how to measure survey reliability and validity. Sage publications; 1995. [DOI:10.4135/9781483348957]
24. Boonsatean W, Carlsson A, Rosner Id, Östman M. sex-related illness perception and self-management of a Thai type 2 diabetes population: a cross-sectional descriptive design. BMC endocr disord j 2018;18(1):5. [DOI:10.1186/s12902-017-0229-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Thompson B. exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington, dc; 2004;10694. [DOI:10.1037/10694-000]
26. Bryant Fb, Yarnold Pr. principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. American psycho assoc; 1995;99-136 [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nursing And Midwifery Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb