Volume 22, Issue 6 (10-2024)
Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2024, 22(6): 463-475 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: A-10-4203-1
Ethics code: IR.UMSU.REC.1401.332
Clinical trials code: A-10-4203-1
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mesgarzadeh M, Rabiepur S, Gharaaghaji R, Pashaei Z. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHILDBEARING MOTIVATIONS AND FERTILITY PREFERENCES OF COUPLES REFERRING TO COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTERS IN URMIA CITY IN 2022. Nursing and Midwifery Journal 2024; 22 (6) :463-475
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5122-en.html
URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5122-en.html
1- Lecturer, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , mesgarzadeh2005@yahoo.com
2- Professor of Reproductive Health, Midwifery Department, Reproductive Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- Master's student in counseling in midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Professor of Reproductive Health, Midwifery Department, Reproductive Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- Master's student in counseling in midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract: (1199 Views)
Background & Aim: Population changes due to declining fertility and increasing life expectancy are significant global concerns, particularly in Iran. The desire to have children and the fertility preferences are two crucial factors that strongly influence the reproductive decisions of couples. The motivation to have children is a multifaceted issue influenced by cultural, behavioral, and religious aspects, and it evolves in the context of population changes, as well as economic and social development. Fertility preferences are directly linked to the desire to have children, reflecting the emotional desires of couples. The study aimed to determine the link between childbearing motivations and fertility preferences of couples attending comprehensive health centers in Urmia City in 2023.
Materials & Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study on 223 couples referred to comprehensive health centers in Urmia City. The research used a multi-stage sampling method and employed the demographic information questionnaire, Miller's Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire (1995) and Miller's Fertility Preferences Questionnaire (1995) for data collection. The data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20 and various statistical tests.
Results: The results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in their positive motives for having children (p < 0.05). However, women had significantly more negative motives for having children than men (p < 0.05). The findings also revealed that as the positive motives for having children increased, the desire to have children increased, particularly among men who desired to have girls (p = 0.02). The time between marriage and the couple's first fertility decreases (p<0.001). Also, the findings showed that with the increase in the positive motives of having children, the desire to have children increases especially with the desired gender of the girl among men. (p=0.002). However, in women under this study, if there is a desire for the child to be a girl, their negative motivations also decrease (p<0.001). This finding applies to men as well, and they also showed less negative motivations as they increased their desire for the child to be a boy (p=0.04).
Conclusion: There is a positive and significant relationship between fertility preferences and positive motivations for having children, that is, with the increase of these motivations, people's desire to have children increases. Therefore, policies based on creating positive incentives to have children can have a significant impact on increasing the country's fertility rate.
Materials & Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study on 223 couples referred to comprehensive health centers in Urmia City. The research used a multi-stage sampling method and employed the demographic information questionnaire, Miller's Childbearing Motivation Questionnaire (1995) and Miller's Fertility Preferences Questionnaire (1995) for data collection. The data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20 and various statistical tests.
Results: The results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in their positive motives for having children (p < 0.05). However, women had significantly more negative motives for having children than men (p < 0.05). The findings also revealed that as the positive motives for having children increased, the desire to have children increased, particularly among men who desired to have girls (p = 0.02). The time between marriage and the couple's first fertility decreases (p<0.001). Also, the findings showed that with the increase in the positive motives of having children, the desire to have children increases especially with the desired gender of the girl among men. (p=0.002). However, in women under this study, if there is a desire for the child to be a girl, their negative motivations also decrease (p<0.001). This finding applies to men as well, and they also showed less negative motivations as they increased their desire for the child to be a boy (p=0.04).
Conclusion: There is a positive and significant relationship between fertility preferences and positive motivations for having children, that is, with the increase of these motivations, people's desire to have children increases. Therefore, policies based on creating positive incentives to have children can have a significant impact on increasing the country's fertility rate.
References
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=fertility+rate. [URL:]
2. Division SAP. World population prospects: the 2008 revision: United Nations Publications; 2015. [URL:]
3. Mehri N, Messkoub M, Kunkel S. Trends, determinants and the implications of population aging in Iran. Ageing Int 2020;45(4):327-43. [URL:] [DOI:10.1007/s12126-020-09364-z]
4. Mohammadi S, Yazdani Charati J, Mousavinasab N. Factors affecting Iran's population aging, 2016. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2017;27(155):71-8. [URL:]
5. World and regional statistics, national data, maps, rankings 2020. [Google Books:]
6. Fooladi M. An analysis of the consequences of fertility and population decline in Iran. Maarefat Farhangi 2020;43(11):69-88. [URL:]
7. Mahmoodi M. Demographic changes and challenges ahead and the need to revise Iran's population policies. Socio-Political Quarterly 2010;11(41):1-34. [URL:]
8. Lukas D, Mayer P. Introduction to Demographic Studies. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2016. [URL:]
9. Maleki S, Sadeghifar J, KHorshidi A, Zargoshi R, Dargahi H. Investigating the causes of reluctance to have childbirth in married couples without children in Ilam province in 2022: A Survey Study. Nurs Midwifery J 2024;21(10):809-16. [URL:] [DOI:10.61186/unmf.21.10.809]
10. Kalantari S, Abbaszadeh M, Aminmozafari F, Rakeibonab N. The sociological study of attitude to child bearing and it's some related factors (Case study: married youth In Tabriz City). J Appl Sociol 2010;21(1):83-104. [URL:]
11. Eshaghi M, Mohebi SF, Papynezhad S, Jahandar Z. Childbearing challenges for working women; a qualitative study. J Women Dev Polit 2014;12(1):111-34. [URL:]
12. Mousavi S, Ghafelebashi M. A study of attitudes towards childbearing in young families of Qazvin city. J Women Fam Stud 2001. [URL:]
13. Gray E, Evans A, Reimondos A. Childbearing desires of childless men and women: When are goals adjusted? Adv Life Course Res 2013;18(2):141-9. [PMID: 24796265] [DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003]
14. Corroon M, Speizer IS, Fotso J-C, Akiode A, Saad A, Calhoun L, et al. The role of gender empowerment on reproductive health outcomes in urban Nigeria. Matern Child Health J 2014;18(1):307-15. [PMID: 23576403] [DOI:10.1007/s10995-013-1266-1] [PMCID: PMC4022125]
15. Keshavarz H, Bahramian M, Mohajerani A, Hossein-Pour K. Factors affecting differences in fertility behavior of Resident and migrating tribes of Samirom. Health Serv Res 2012;8(3):456-65. [URL:]
16. Khadivzadeh T, Rajati R, Esmaeili H, Danes F. The Relationship of the Current and Desired Number of Children with the Quality of Marital Relationship and Fertility Motivations among Employed Women and their Husbands. J Midwifery Reprod Health 2020;9(1):2573-81. [URL:]
17. Ghazanfarpour M, Arghavani E, Khadivzadeh T, Saeidi M, Kareshki H, Irani M, et al. Childbearing Motivation in Iranian Engaged Couples: A Structural Equation Model. Int J Pediatr 2018;6(4):7563-8. [URL:]
18. Irani M, Khadivzadeh T. The relationship between childbearing motivations with fertility preferences and actual child number in reproductive-age women in Mashhad, Iran. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7. [PMID: 30693309] [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_175_18] [PMCID: PMC6332655]
19. Ahmadi Rezamahaleh F, Khadivzadeh T, Asghari Nekah M. Comparing the Childbearing Motivations of Fertile and Infertile Women in Mashhad, Iran. J Midwifery Reprod Health 2020;8(4):2429-36. [URL:]
20. Mynarska M, Rytel J. Fertility Desires of Childless Poles: Which Childbearing Motives Matter for Men and Women? J Fam Issues 2020;41(1):7-32. [URL:] [DOI:10.1177/0192513X19868257]
21. Miller WB. Childbearing motivation and its measurement. J Biosoc Sci 1995;27(4):473-87. [PMID: 7593054] [DOI:10.1017/S0021932000023087]
22. Donnez J, Dolmans M-M. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med 2017;377(17):1657-65. [PMID: 29069558] [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra1614676]
23. Rijkin A, Liefbroer A. The Influence of Partner Relationship Quality on Fertility. Eur Assoc Popul Stud 2009;25(1):27-44. [URL:] [DOI:10.1007/s10680-008-9156-8]
24. Farrokh Eslamlou H, Mogadam Tabrizi F, Moeini S, Vahabzadeh Z. Pre-marriage couplesfertility attitude following recent childbearing persuasive policies in Iran. Nurs Midwifery J 2013;11(10):836-46. [URL:]
25. Kennedy DP. Gender, culture change, and fertility decline in Honduras: An investigation in anthropological demography: University of Florida; 2002. [URL:]
26. Khadivzadeh T, Roudsari RL, Bahrami M, Taghipour A, Shavazi MA. " Caring My Family Integrity": Couples' First Childbearing Experience in Urban Society of Mashhad, Iran. Int J Fertil Steril 2013;7:41. [PMID: 25162473] [DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2014.925591]
27. Bongaarts J, Casterline JB. From fertility preferences to reproductive outcomes in the developing world. Popul Dev Rev 2018. [URL:] [DOI:10.1111/padr.12197]
28. Rana MJ, Cleland J, Sekher T, Padmadas SS. Disentangling the effects of reproductive behaviours and fertility preferences on child growth in India. Popul Stud 2020:1-14. [PMID: 33086981] [DOI:10.1080/00324728.2020.1826564]
29. Hekmat F, Kabacoff R, Klein H. Motivations for childbearing and fertility behavior among urban and rural families of Iran. Birth Psychol Bull 1983;4(1):26. [PMID: 12339754] [URL:]
30. Khadivzadeh T AE, Shakeri MT. Relationship between Fertility Motivations and Preferences in Couples. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2015;17(114):8-18. [URL:]
31. Hosseini H, Bagi B. Women's Autonomy and Fertility Ideals Among Kurdish Women In the City of Mahabad. Wom Dev Pol 2013;10(4):57-78. [URL:]
32. Pezeshki MZ, Zeighami B, Miller WB. Measuring the childbearing motivation of couples referred to the Shiraz Health Center for premarital examinations. J Biosoc Sci 2005;37(1):37-53. [PMID: 15688570] [DOI:10.1017/S0021932003006485]
33. Tavousi M, Haerimehrizi A, Sadighi J, Motlagh ME, Eslami M, Naghizadeh F, et al. Fertility desire among Iranians: a nationwide study. Payesh Health Mon 2017;16(4):401-10. [URL:] [DORL: 20.1001.1.16807626.1396.16.4.1.4]
34. Motlagh ME, Taheri M, Eslami M, nasrollapour shirvani sD. Factors affecting the fertility preferences in Iranian ethnic groups. Nurs Midwifery J 2016;14(6):485-95. [URL:]
35. Ahmed GS, Saleh L, Alareed HR, El-Shabrawy EM, Elbahrawe RS. Effects of sociodemographic background on fertility motivation patterns in the Beni-Suef governorate, Upper Egypt. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2022;17(5):853-60. [PMID: 36050960] [DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.006] [PMCID: PMC9391587]
36. Doucet A. Dad and baby in the first year: Gendered responsibilities and embodiment. Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 2009;624(1):78-98. [URL:] [DOI:10.1177/0002716209334069]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Information
Address: Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Deputy of Research and Technology,Djahad Ave.,
Urmia-5714783734, IRAN
P.O. Box: 1138,
Tel: 044 - 331937224
Fax: 044 - 32240642
E-Mail:
j.nur.mid
gmail.com, unmfumsu.ac.ir